Does Uthman burning the Mushafs and uniting the Muslims upon one Mushaf indicate that the Quran has not reached us in its entirety?
Question: Can we say that the Quran has not reached us in its entirety because Uthman bin Affan رضي الله عنه burned many Mushafs and united the Muslims upon one Mushaf, and that the Mushafs he burned contained things that are not found in the Mushaf of Uthman?
Summary:
It is not permissible to say that the Noble Quran has not reached us in its entirety because Uthman bin Affan رضي الله عنه burned the Mushafs. This is because Allah, the Exalted, has guaranteed the preservation of His Book from distortion, additions, and omissions. Allah, the Exalted, says: "Indeed, it is We who sent down the Quran, and indeed, We will be its guardian." [Surah Al-Hijr: 9] Uthman رضي الله عنه united the Muslims upon the Uthmanic Mushafs and ordered the destruction of other Mushafs and written sheets to protect the Quran from differences and disputes. He did not remove anything from the established Quran whose recitation had been finalized after the final review. As for the reports mentioning certain differences between the Mushafs of the Companions, they are not evidence that any part of the Quran was lost. These differences may have been related to the Qiraat, verses whose recitation had been abrogated, or explanations that some Companions wrote in their personal Mushafs. The Companions agreed with Uthman رضي الله عنه regarding the fundamental decision to unite the Muslims upon the Mushafs. His action was not an independent judgment in which he opposed the Muslim Ummah.
Answer:
First issue: Allah has guaranteed the preservation of the Noble Quran
From the Qur'an:
- [Surah Al-Hijr: 9]
"Indeed, it is We who sent down the Quran, and indeed, We will be its guardian."
- [Surah Fussilat: 42]
"Falsehood cannot approach it from before it or from behind it. It is a revelation from a Lord who is All-Wise, Praiseworthy."
- [Surah Al-Qiyamah: 17]
"Indeed, upon Us is its collection and its recitation."
The basis of evidence: Allah has guaranteed the preservation and collection of the Quran. Therefore, nothing of what Allah intended to remain recited until the Day of Resurrection can be lost. The Quran that we possess today is the same Quran that Allah revealed to His Prophet ﷺ and which the Companions, the Tabiin, and those who came after them transmitted through Tawatur, both through memorization and writing.
Second issue: Did Uthman رضي الله عنه actually burn the Mushafs, and why? Yes. It is established in Sahih Al-Bukhari that Uthman رضي الله عنه ordered the burning of other Mushafs and written sheets. However, this was done to unite the Muslims upon standardized Mushafs and prevent differences and disputes concerning the recitation of the Quran, not to conceal anything from the speech of Allah, the Exalted.
From the Salaf:
- Narrated by Al-Bukhari in his Sahih.
Anas bin Malik رضي الله عنه narrated: "Hudhayfah bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman ... Hudhayfah became alarmed by their differences in recitation, so Hudhayfah said to Uthman: 'O Commander of the Believers! Save this Ummah before they differ concerning the Book as the Jews and Christians differed.'" Uthman رضي الله عنه then requested the written sheets that were in the possession of Hafsah and instructed four Companions to copy them into Mushafs. He then sent copies of these Mushafs to the different regions. At the end of the Hadith, it is mentioned: "And he sent to every region a Mushaf from what they had copied, and ordered that all other Quranic materials, whether written on sheets or in Mushafs, be burned."
The basis of evidence: Uthman did not compile the Quran independently from the beginning. Rather, he relied upon the written sheets that had been compiled during the Caliphate of Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq and were in the possession of Hafsah bint Umar. He instructed that copies be made from these sheets and sent to the different regions, then ordered the removal of the other Mushafs to prevent differences.
Third issue: Did the Companions agree with Uthman رضي الله عنه regarding the burning of the Mushafs? Yes.
From the Salaf:
- Narrated by Ibn Abi Dawud in Al-Masahif (p. 96). Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar authenticated its chain of narration in Fath Al-Bari (8/634).
It is authentically reported that Ali bin Abi Talib رضي الله عنه said: "Do not say anything about Uthman except good. By Allah, he did not do what he did concerning the Mushafs except after consulting a group of us." He then mentioned that Uthman consulted the Companions regarding uniting the Muslims upon one Mushaf and that they agreed with him.
The basis of evidence: Uthman did not undertake this action independently. Rather, he consulted the Companions, who agreed with him, including Ali bin Abi Talib رضي الله عنه. Ibn Masud رضي الله عنه objected to certain procedures involved in the compilation. However, this does not invalidate the agreement of the Companions regarding the Mushaf upon which the Muslim Ummah eventually settled.
Fourth issue: Did the burned Mushafs contain verses that were not present in the Uthmanic Mushaf? This is the main issue raised in the question. There are reports mentioning differences in certain personal Mushafs belonging to the Companions. However, these reports cannot be used as evidence that Uthman رضي الله عنه removed anything from the Quran whose recitation was supposed to remain. These differences can be attributed to several matters, including: 1. Differences in the Ahruf and Qiraat: The Quran was revealed in seven Ahruf. Uthman رضي الله عنه then united the Muslims upon the written form of the Uthmanic Mushafs to prevent differences, while the authentic, Mutawatir Qiraat that conformed to the written form remained preserved. 2. Verses whose recitation had been abrogated: Some portions of the Quran were previously recited, but their recitation was subsequently abrogated through revelation from Allah, the Exalted. Therefore, their absence from the Mushaf does not constitute an omission from the Quran. 3. Interpretations and explanations: Some Companions would write explanatory words in their personal Mushafs to clarify the meanings of verses. These words were not part of the recited Quran.
From the Qur'an:
- [Surah Al-Baqarah: 106]
"We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth one better than it or similar to it."
- [Surah Al-Ala: 6–7]
"We will make you recite, and you will not forget, except what Allah wills."
Therefore, not everything that has been established as having been recited during a particular stage of revelation must necessarily be part of the Quran whose recitation was finalized toward the end of the Prophet's life. The scholars have discussed this matter when explaining the differences between the personal Mushafs of the Companions.
Fifth issue: Was the Quran preserved before Uthman رضي الله عنه compiled the Mushafs? Yes. The Quran had already been memorized by the Companions and written down during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ. Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq رضي الله عنه then compiled it into written sheets. Zayd bin Thabit رضي الله عنه narrated that Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq رضي الله عنه instructed him to compile the Quran after a number of Quran reciters were martyred in the Battle of Al-Yamamah.
From the Salaf:
- Narrated by Al-Bukhari in his Sahih.
Zayd رضي الله عنه said: "So I began searching for the Quran and collecting it from palm stalks, thin stones, and the memories of men." The written sheets then remained with Abu Bakr, followed by Umar, and subsequently with Hafsah رضي الله عنهم
The basis of evidence: The preservation of the Quran did not depend upon a single Mushaf that could be lost through burning. Rather, it was preserved in the memories of the Companions and recorded in written sheets. It was then transmitted to the Muslim Ummah through direct learning and Tawatur.
Sixth issue: Statements of the scholars regarding Uthman's رضي الله عنه compilation of the Mushafs
From the Scholars:
- Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Baz رحمه الله:
"When Uthman رضي الله عنه learned of the differences among the people, and Hudhayfah رضي الله عنه came to him and said, 'Save the people,' he consulted the Companions who were present during his time, such as Ali, Talhah, Al-Zubair رضي الله عنهم , and others. They advised him to unite the Quran upon one Harf so that the people would not differ."
- He also said:
"Uniting the people upon one Harf was a good deed, and Uthman رضي الله عنه and the Companions deserve to be thanked for it, as it facilitated matters, made things easier, and eliminated the causes of disagreement among the Muslims."
The basis of evidence: Uthman's رضي الله عنه intention was to preserve the Quran and maintain the unity of the Muslims. He did not intend to remove or alter anything from the Quran.
- Sheikh Salih Al-Fawzan حفظه الله:
"If a Mushaf is in a condition where it can no longer be used because it has become torn, then it may either be buried in a clean place or burned. Both of these methods were practiced by the Companions of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ."
He also mentioned that the Companions burned the Mushafs when they united the Muslims upon the Mushaf of Uthman. The basis of evidence: Burning the pages of Mushafs for a legitimate Islamic purpose does not constitute disrespect toward the Quran or the destruction of the preserved speech of Allah.
- Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani رحمه الله:
He authenticated the chain of narration of the report from Ali bin Abi Talib رضي الله عنه concerning the Companions' agreement with Uthman رضي الله عنه regarding the compilation of the Mushafs. This is mentioned in Fath Al-Bari (8/634).
This demonstrates that Uthman's رضي الله عنه action was undertaken in consultation with the Companions and was not an independent decision intended to remove anything from the Quran.
- Fatwa from the Islam Question and Answer website
A fatwa titled "Uthman's رضي الله عنه compilation of the Quran, the Companions' consensus regarding the Quran he compiled, and refuting certain doubts" explains that Uthman relied upon the written sheets compiled during the time of Abu Bakr. He had copies made from these sheets, sent the Mushafs to the various regions, and removed the other Mushafs to eliminate the causes of disputes and differences.
Conclusion: The Noble Quran that we possess today is complete and preserved through the preservation guaranteed by Allah, the Exalted. Uthman bin Affan رضي الله عنه did not remove anything from the Quran whose recitation had been finalized. Rather, he united the Muslims upon the Uthmanic Mushafs with the agreement of the Companions and ordered the removal of other Mushafs to prevent differences and discord. As for the reports mentioning differences between certain personal Mushafs belonging to the Companions, these do not indicate that any part of the Quran was lost. Rather, each report must be examined according to its authenticity and whether it relates to a particular Qiraah, an explanation, or the abrogation of recitation. Accordingly, the questioner's statement that the Quran has not reached us in its entirety because Uthman رضي الله عنه burned the Mushafs is incorrect. This statement contradicts what is established by the Quran and Sunnah, as well as the consensus of the Muslims regarding the preservation of the Noble Quran from additions and omissions.
And Allah knows best.
← Back to QuestionsRelated Answers
How Can a Person Build a Strong Relationship With the Qur’an and Be Among the People of Allah
how can a person develop a relationship with the quran and become from the special people of Allah
What Benefits the Deceased? Do Acts of Worship Performed for the Dead Reach Them?
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته I have a question, Shaykh. What is the ruling on a person who goes to a grave and asks the deceased to ask Allah to forgive him or provide for him? Is this considered an innovation (bidʿah) and misguidance, or is it major shirk? I have come across differing statements from some contemporary scholars. For example, Shaykh Salih al-Fawzan and Shaykh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh (and others) have stated that asking the dead to ask Allah for you constitutes major shirk. However, Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen and some others appear to distinguish between asking the deceased to fulfill one’s need directly (which they classify as major shirk) and asking the deceased merely to supplicate to Allah on one’s behalf — which they describe as bidʿah and misguidance, but not major shirk. Additionally, I have seen criticism directed at Shaykh Abdulaziz al-Turayfi, not only regarding his methodology of being ikhwani, but also specifically because he reportedly held the view that asking the dead to ask Allah for you is bidʿah rather than shirk. Some critics claimed this indicates weakness in understanding Tawḥīd. How should these differing statements be understood? Is this a difference in classification, a difference in terminology, or a difference in underlying principles? جزاكم الله خيرًا
Does Ignorance Excuse a Person who Believed Something Contrary to the Qur'an and was Unaware of the Ruling of Disbelief?
Assalamu Alaikum Sheikh. I want to know one thing. Many years ago when I was 14 years old, I made a mistake. I knew that something was written in the Quran but I thought and i believe that the opposite of what was written in the Quran would happen in the future. I did not realize that my idea and believe was completely wrong. Is this my ignorance? I did not know what kufr was at that time. Do I have to be held accountable and are my salah and supplications at that time valid and accepted? Another question is if someone is ignorant of the ruling that knowingly denying or disbelieving in something in Islam is kufr, and he knowingly denies or disbelieving in something in Islam, will he be guilty of kufr and will he be held accountable? jazakallah khair
Are All Seven Ahruf of the Qur’an the Speech of Allah?
اَلسَلامُ عَلَيْكُم I know The Quran was revealed in seven dialects. I know Qur'an is word of Allaah . So I want to know as Quran was revealed in seven dialects, so can we say all dialects are word of Allaah and all 7 types Allaah spoke
Why Did Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) Say "The Quran Is Sufficient for Us" During the Prophet's Final Illness?
Why did Umar r.a deny the pen to the Prophet S.A.W?And he said that the Quran is sufficient for us,so hadith is not as per him?isnt this contradiction?
What Is The Ruling On Saying The Qur'an Is Shifa` And Injeel Is Shifa` And Torah Is Shifa`?
what Is the ruling on one who says the Qur'an Is shifa` And Injeel is shifa` and Torah Is shifa`?.
Why Must the Quran and Sunnah Be Understood According to the Salaf?
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته جزاك الله خيرا Why is it important for someone to under the quran and the sunnah based on the understanding of the salaf? Why can we not interpret the Quran and the sunnah with the quran and the sunnah instead? I would appreciate it if you can help me understand this from a more deeper angle, as a individual raised such questions in me. I want myself to be firm upon the way of the salaf. May Allah reward and bless you Shykh.
If the Sunnah Is Revelation From Allah, Why Was It Not Included in the Qur’an, and How Can We Know That Its Rulings Are Truly From Allah?
If the Qur’an is revelation from Allah, and the Sunnah is also revelation or a divine source of legislation, then why did Allah not make the rulings found in the Sunnah part of the Qur’an? And why was the Qur’an preserved with certainty, while the Sunnah reached us through human narrations that vary in their authenticity? What is the criterion by which I can know that a ruling found in a hadith is truly a ruling from Allah, rather than a Prophetic judgment or a later human narration?
How Can We Respond to the Doubts Concerning the Prophet ﷺ Being Bewitched, Attempting to Throw Himself From a Mountain, and Forgetting Some Verses of the Quran?
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته How can we reconcile the infallibility of the Prophet ﷺ in conveying revelation with the narrations concerning him being bewitched (Sahih al-Bukhari 5765), the report that he attempted to throw himself from a mountain during the interruption of revelation (Sahih al-Bukhari 6982), and his forgetting of the Quran? Furthermore, has it been authentically established that Aisha رضي الله عنها was bewitched? I request clarification regarding the authenticity of these narrations and how the scholars have explained them.